Home » Small Law » Infographic Friday: The Case Against Billable Hours

Infographic Friday: The Case Against Billable Hours

AFAs increase firm size decrease

Data suggests that smaller firms are more inclined to structure alternative fee arrangements (AFA) than larger firms.  However, as so often in law, such assertions –  even data driven assertions – are not always so cut and dry.  Whether that’s true or not might be better answered by saying, “It depends.”

It does depend. The graphic below the headline on this post is a screenshot from an infographic stemming from the Enterprise Legal Management Trends, report issued last fall and based on about $10 billion in legal fees.  It found firms with less than 50 attorneys structured legal fees more often under AFAs than any other category in the data set.

AFAs can be a competitive advantage, argued Kris Satkunas, in a piece published on Inside Counsel titled, Four certainties about alternative fee arrangements. One reason that might be true is pricing strategies, which is in essence is what AFAs are, is one way to differentiate a service in a highly competitive market.  She wrote:

Some industry watchers suggest AFAs are simply a vehicle for the general counsel to drive a hard bargain with law firms. The reality, however, is about driving efficiency — and efficiency presents the opportunity for firms to grow more business. In the eyes of the corporate law department, outside counsel raises the question of value rather than price. For law firms, it’s an opportunity to strengthen a relationship with a client and, perhaps. To win a greater share of work in the process.

The Case against Billable Hours

One law firm has made the case against billable hours in this infographic, which is well constructed and based on secondary sources, from credible legal trade articles published circa 2012.  The infographic reinforces what San Diego Law Firm (Google+ | Twitter | Facebook) says makes it different on it’s about us page:

With fixed fees, you’ll know how much our services will cost before we get started, and we’ll discuss your options with you along the way.

The infographic makes three arguments against billable hours:

1. Billable hours rewards lawyers for inefficient processes. “Unset time to achieve vague goals leaves too many uncertainties,” reads the infographic.

2. Lawyers are pressured to meet quotas. The infographic says the ABA recommendations 1,300 billable hours per year per lawyer, however the average requirement today is about 1,800 hours.

3. Law firms promote based on time billed rather than skill. The infographic cites a “leaked email” from another law firm with a numerical rating ostensibly used to assign legal projects.

AFAs ebb and flow in the headlines of our industry. While we don’t think they’ve quite hit mass adoption, there are indications the growth is slow and steady.

What do you think?  Are AFAs more hype than substance?  Can they be a competitive advantage?

Here’s the complete infographic:


If you enjoyed this post, you might also like:
Seven Essential AFA Articles Every Lawyer Should Read

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Plusone Linkedin Digg Delicious Reddit Stumbleupon Tumblr Posterous Email Snailmail

About Frank Strong

Frank Strong
Frank Strong is the communications director for the LexisNexis software division located on NC State’s Centennial Campus in Raleigh. In this capacity, he leads communications efforts in support of software products for law practice and law department management and also litigation tools – across large law, small law and corporate counsel segments. With more than 15 years of experience in the high-tech sector, Strong previously served as director of public relations for Vocus, which developed marketing, PR and media monitoring software. He has held multiple roles both in-house with corporations, ranging from startups to global organizations, and has also endured the rigors of billable hours, having completed gigs at PR firms including the top 10 global firm Hill & Knowlton. A veteran of two year-long deployments, Strong has concurrently served in uniform in reserve components of the military for more than 20 years, initially as an enlisted Marine and later as an infantry officer in the Army National Guard. Strong holds a BA in Film and TV production from Worcester State University, an M.A. in Public Communication from American University, and an M.B.A. from Marymount University. He is a PADI-certified Master Scuba Diver and holds a USPA "B" skydiving license.

Wonderful representation of infographics specifically designed to get the things ahead with the segment. So as to make the things more clear and confined, we prefer using the tool that makes a difference in all possible segments. If time is wasted in the segment of managing the billable hours, it doesn't make a sense in any possible ways. Here with I would like to share one article that I defines how easily tracking and invoicing billable hours is defined in a full fledged manner. Here is the link - http://www.replicon.com/articles/tracking-and-invoicing-billable-hours-without-wasting-time.aspx


  1. […] billing, except some firms charge clients using Alternative Fee Agreements (“AFA”). An article I came across recently forced me to stop and consider flat fee billing. The crux of the three arguments against hourly […]

  2. […] billable hour will not go away. There’s been a lot of buzz about fixed price models and alternative fee arrangements, but even speaking with partners at some […]